Difference between revisions of "Public Wealth Wiki"
m |
|||
(108 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | India has enormous public wealth. This is the wealth that is owned by the people and controlled by the government.<ref>Article 297, Constitution of India, 1950</ref>. | |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | The goal of Dhan Vapasi wiki is to pull together information of public wealth of India from credible and publicly available sources. | |
− | + | Such information is fragmented and mostly unavailable at present. Dhan Vapasi wiki aims to fill this deficit. | |
− | + | The public wealth of India belongs to its citizens and so does the information about its details. | |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | The value that can be derived out of India's natural resources has been estimated at ₹ 1,000 crores <ref> This value is the realisable value estimated as 25% of the total value of natural resources. </ref> | |
− | India has enormous public wealth. This is the wealth that is owned by the people and controlled by the government | + | The value of surplus public land available in the country is ₹ 340 crores. This wealth is more than ₹50 lakh for each household in India. |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | {|class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 65% | |
− | + | |+ style="color:#2B3990;"| | |
− | + | '''Dhan Vapsi Fund''' | |
− | + | ! colspan="2" scope="col" style="width: 110px;" | '''Resource''' | |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 110px;" | '''Value (₹ lakh crore)''' | |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 110px;" | '''Value per household (₹)''' | |
− | + | |- | |
+ | | colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" |'''[[Wiki_2.0#Land|Surplus Public Land]]'''||style="text-align:center;" |340||style="text-align:right;"|13,60,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="2" style="text-align:left;"|'''[[Wiki_2.0#Minerals|Natural Resources]]'''||style="text-align:center;" |1,252||style="text-align:right;"|50,11,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | rowspan="3"| ||style="text-align:left;"| Hydrocarbon||style="text-align:center;" |378||style="text-align:right;"|15,12,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align:left;"| Mines & Minerals||style="text-align:center;" |847||style="text-align:right;"|33,90,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align:left;"| Radioactive Substances||style="text-align:center;" |27||style="text-align:right;"|1,09,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan ="2" style="text-align:left;" style="background:#B9D3EE;"|'''Value of Dhan Vapsi Fund as on February 2018'''|| style="background:#B9D3EE;text-align:center;"|'''₹ 1,592 lakh crore'''||style="background:#B9D3EE;text-align:right;"|'''₹ 63,71,000''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan ="2" style="text-align:left; background:#B9D3EE;"|'''Duration Dhan Vapsi Fund can last'''||style="text-align:center; background:#B9D3EE;" colspan="2" |'''63 Years''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | <br> | ||
=Background= | =Background= | ||
− | Historically, the ownership of public wealth belonged to the kings in India and most other parts of the world by the invocation of the divine rights or through means of coercion. Presently, the rights over the public wealth belong to the democratically elected Indian government, which is obligated under the constitution to use this wealth for public good. | + | Historically, the ownership of public wealth belonged to the kings in India and most other parts of the world by the invocation of the divine rights or through means of coercion. Presently, the rights over the public wealth belong to the democratically elected Indian government, which is obligated under the constitution to use this wealth for public good.<ref>Article 39 (b) states – “The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing ... (b) that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good.”</ref> |
==Ancient India== | ==Ancient India== | ||
− | In ancient India, even though the Kings represented the State, the mineral wealth did not vest in them. They were only entitled to receive the taxes or revenue form the production or extraction of minerals. Simultaneously, the ownership of other public resources such as forests and water bodies were shared by the community which relied on them. However, the ownership of mineral resources gradually transferred to the state beginning with the empire of Chandragupta Maurya, particularly as Kautilya justified state monopoly over mineral resources in his seminal work Arthasastra. The ownership of resources other than minerals, such as forests and water bodies, continued to be with the kings or the community in one form or the other across India till the arrival of the British East India Company. | + | In ancient India, even though the Kings represented the State, the mineral wealth did not vest in them. They were only entitled to receive the taxes or revenue form the production or extraction of minerals.<ref>Indian Bureau of Mines. (2011). Mineral Royalties. Nagpur: Indian Bureau of Mines.</ref> Simultaneously, the ownership of other public resources such as forests and water bodies were shared by the community which relied on them. However, the ownership of mineral resources gradually transferred to the state beginning with the empire of Chandragupta Maurya, particularly as Kautilya<ref>Ancient Indian teacher, philosopher, economist, jurist, and royal advisor, 371-283 BC.</ref> justified state monopoly over mineral resources in his seminal work Arthasastra.<ref>Supra, Note 5.</ref> The ownership of resources other than minerals, such as forests and water bodies, continued to be with the kings or the community in one form or the other across India till the arrival of the British East India Company. |
==British India== | ==British India== | ||
− | The British East India Company started using the power of the state to acquire private property for public use as early as 1824 in Bengal and other parts of India. The Bengal Regulation I of 1824 allowed the Company to obtain private properties by paying a fair price for construction of “roads, canals, or other public purposes” when the Company only had limited rights related to taxation and trade as per the powers bestowed on it by the British Crown. Thus, all acquisitions conducted under the Bengal regulation and similar laws in other parts of India were patently illegal until 1857 when the British Crown took over control of India. Following that, the British acquired most of the natural and mineral resources of India; either by acquisition with meagre compensation or by coercion. | + | The British East India Company started using the power of the state to acquire private property<ref>The power of “Eminent Domain” – Forceful acquisition or requisition of property by the government for public purpose.</ref> for public use as early as 1824 in Bengal and other parts of India. The Bengal Regulation I of 1824 allowed the Company to obtain private properties by paying a fair price for construction of “roads, canals, or other public purposes”<ref>Bhattacharyya, D. (2015). History of Eminent Domain in Colonial Thought and Legal Practice. Economic & Political Weekly, L (50), 46.</ref> when the Company only had limited rights related to taxation and trade as per the powers bestowed on it by the British Crown. Thus, all acquisitions conducted under the Bengal regulation and similar laws in other parts of India were patently illegal until 1857 when the British Crown took over control of India. Following that, the British acquired most of the natural and mineral resources of India; either by acquisition with meagre compensation or by coercion. |
− | Concurrently with the British rule, different princely states in India adopted similar policies with respect to the ownership of public wealth. While some states adopted the state’s ownership of public wealth, others bestowed the ownership to the community. Some states neglected the issue altogether and adopted a non-property attitude towards public wealth and kept it as commons, particularly in case of forests and water bodies. | + | Concurrently with the British rule, different princely states in India adopted similar policies with respect to the ownership of public wealth. While some states adopted the state’s ownership of public wealth, others bestowed the ownership to the community. Some states neglected the issue altogether and adopted a non-property attitude towards public wealth and kept it as commons<ref>Cultural or natural resource accessible to all members of the society. </ref>, particularly in case of forests and water bodies. |
==Modern India== | ==Modern India== | ||
The Constitution of India bestows the ownership and control over using resources is in hands of the central and state governments under various articles. However, individuals and corporations can make use of the public resources under a license from the government. | The Constitution of India bestows the ownership and control over using resources is in hands of the central and state governments under various articles. However, individuals and corporations can make use of the public resources under a license from the government. | ||
− | Since independence, there has been no concrete effort by the central or the state governments to define public wealth or regulate the same in a meaningful manner, instead the governments have chosen to deal with the issue on an ad-hoc basis. Noting the same, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, while announcing the judgment on 2G scam in 2012, observed – “no comprehensive legislation has been enacted to generally define natural resources and a framework for their protection.” | + | Since independence, there has been no concrete effort by the central or the state governments to define public wealth or regulate the same in a meaningful manner, instead the governments have chosen to deal with the issue on an ad-hoc basis. Noting the same, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, while announcing the judgment on 2G scam in 2012, observed – “no comprehensive legislation has been enacted to generally define natural resources and a framework for their protection.”<ref>Centre for Public Interest Litigation and others v. Union of India and others, (2012) 3 SCC 1</ref> |
− | Given the constitutional provisions, the Indian state is the trustee and legal owner of the public wealth of India under the doctrine of public trust, which "enjoins upon the Government to protect the resources for the enjoyment of the public rather than to permit their use for private ownership or commercial purposes". Natural resources belong to the people, but the State legally owns them on our behalf. | + | Given the constitutional provisions, the Indian state is the trustee and legal owner of the public wealth of India under the doctrine of public trust, which "enjoins upon the Government to protect the resources for the enjoyment of the public rather than to permit their use for private ownership or commercial purposes".<ref>M. C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997)1 SCC 388</ref> Natural resources belong to the people, but the State legally owns them on our behalf. |
=Public Wealth of India= | =Public Wealth of India= | ||
+ | |||
+ | Public wealth is the sum of the public assets collectively owned by all citizens of the country. The government is the manager of this public wealth. | ||
+ | It comprises of public commercial assets under the government, such as various natural resources, public sector undertakings (PSUs) and commercial real estate. The term ''public'' consists of wealth owned by all the levels of government namely, central, state, and local levels. | ||
+ | ''Public assets'' do not comprise ''public property'', which refers to assets and resources that are available to the entire public for use, such as roads and bridges, public parks, protected wildlife sanctuaries. | ||
+ | Public wealth consists of assets or operations generating an income that could be given some kind of market value if properly structured and used. Typical examples include: | ||
+ | * minerals | ||
+ | * real estate such as Lutyens Bungalow Zone (New Delhi), Navy Nagar (Mumbai) | ||
+ | * central and state public sector enterprises | ||
+ | * financial institutions | ||
+ | * land banks available with various state land development authorities and in special economic zones (SEZs) | ||
+ | * land and buildings under the government for provision of non-essential functions <ref> Non-essential functions are those that are not directly connected with the maintenance of law and order, and national security. </ref>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The total public wealth recorded from publicly available information is ₹ 1,341 lakh crore (₹ 53,64,000 per household <ref> No. of households – 25 crore (125 crore population [Census 2011] / 5 [size of a household as per GoI]) </ref>) as on October 2018. | ||
+ | |||
==Land== | ==Land== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | === | + | Land among capital, labour and entrepreneurial skills is one of the four fundamental resources that determines the size and productivity of an economy. |
− | + | Land in India is suffering from an artificial scarcity created out of a high cost of acquisition from excessive regulations. Major urban land parcels are lying vacant and unused locking valuable land available in the market. | |
− | The | + | The following calculation points out there is ample land available in the country – |
− | + | <br> | |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | If one places 1.2 billion people in four-person homes of 1000 square feet each, and two workers of the family into office/factory space of 400 square feet, this requires roughly 1 per cent of India's land area assuming an FSI of 1. <ref> Shah A, [//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/19949364.cms?from=mdr&utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst Economic Times] "Why real estate is a bad long-term investment" </ref> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Yet the price of land in a city like Mumbai or Delhi is much more compared to major cities across the world. | ||
+ | The government-owned land is part of the problem. An estimate holds that governments own as much as __ per cent of total available land in the country [IDF report pick the number/ idea]. This keeps away productive land from falling into private hands for generating revenue and employment. | ||
+ | The defence forces are the largest landowners in the country. Excluding the prime urban land occupied in cities by defence stations, the surplus land as per internal and CG audits is 78,846 acres. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Railways are the second largest landowners in the country with 6,407 acres land available.<ref> as disclose by railways, however, there exists a larger unfound inventory requiring a thorough audit</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Major ports in the country also hold huge tracts of land. The land available with all the major ports is 27,379 acres. | ||
+ | |||
+ | National Textile Corporation holds 1,158 acres of prime urban land locked by defunct mills within densely populated cities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Various public sector enterprises, now defunct, or serial loss-making enterprises have locked away highly valuable urban land parcels. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Special Economic Zones are a special case of how land was forecefully extracted and acquired from the poor in the name of industralisation, only to remain wasted and unusued. The land available with them is an estimated 72,847 acres. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The table below highlights many such insitutions and bodies locking away land in cities. This list is bound to expand as more information is uncovered. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Table 2 and Table 3 point out the surplus land available with various government bodies owned by central and state governments. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {|class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 66% | ||
+ | |+ style="color:#2B3990;"|'''Table 2: Surplus Public Land Under Central Government''' | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 15px;" | # | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 250px;" | Body Name | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Area (acre) | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Value (₹ crore) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |1||[[Air India]]||style="text-align:center;"|NA<ref> Information on the total land held by Air India is not known, however its approximate value is made available in the financial reports</ref>||style="text-align:right;"|8,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2|| [[Railways]]||style="text-align:center;"|6,407||style="text-align:right;"|2,70,406 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |3||[[Defence]]||style="text-align:center;"|296,914||style="text-align:right;"|24,53,664 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |4|| [[Department of Posts]]||style="text-align:center;"|1,146||style="text-align:right;"|366 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |5|| [[Delhi Development Authority]]||style="text-align:center;"|5,675||style="text-align:right;"|1,00,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |6|| [[Heavy Engineering Corporation]] ||style="text-align:center;"|5,000 ||style="text-align:right;"|14,560 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |8||[[Hindustan Machines and Tools Ltd.]] ||style="text-align:center;"|471||style="text-align:right;"|997 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |9||[[Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)]] ||style="text-align:center;"|2,982 ||style="text-align:right;"|6,140 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |10||[[Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd]] ||style="text-align:center;"|938 ||style="text-align:right;"|20,224 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |11||[[National Textile Corporation]] ||style="text-align:center;"|1,158 ||style="text-align:right;"|25,622 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |12||[[Port Trusts]] ||style="text-align:center;"|27,379 ||style="text-align:right;"|20,02,717 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |13||[[Richardson & Cruddas]]||style="text-align:center;"|76||style="text-align:right;"|9,824 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |14||[[Steel Authority of India Limited]]||style="text-align:center;"|29,008||style="text-align:right;"|58,149 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |15||[[Lutyens Bungalow Zone]]||style="text-align:center;"|6,177||style="text-align:right;"|19,32,683 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | scope = "row" colspan = "2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Total''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''383,331 acre''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''₹ 68.62 lakh crore''' | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {|class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 66% | ||
+ | |+ style="color:#2B3990;"|'''Table 3: Surplus Public Land Under State Governments''' | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 15px;" | # | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 250px;" | Body Name | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Area (acre) | ||
+ | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Value (₹ crore) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 1||[[National Capital Region of Delhi|Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board]]||style="text-align:center;" | 5,675 || style="text-align:right;" | 48,480 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2||[[Punjab Urban Development Authority ]] ||style="text-align:center;" |7,337 ||style="text-align:right;" |14,848 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 3||[[Karnataka Public Land Corporation Limited ]]||style="text-align:center;" | 474||style="text-align:right;" |6,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 4||[[State Infrastructure and Industrial Development Corporation of Uttarakahnd Limited]] || style="text-align:center;" |2,016 || style="text-align:right;" |3,988 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 5||[[Rajasthan State Industrial Investment and Corporation Limited]] ||style="text-align:center;" | 1,150 ||style="text-align:right;" |2,645 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 6||[[Assam Industrial Development Corporation]]|| style="text-align:center;" |471||style="text-align:right;" |2,350 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 7||[[Haryana Revenue Department]]||style="text-align:center;" |674||style="text-align:right;" |1,414 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 8||[[Haldia Development Authority]]||style="text-align:center;" |624 ||style="text-align:right;" |730 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 9||[[Ranchi Industrial Area Development Authority]]||style="text-align:center;" |184 ||style="text-align:right;" |630 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 10||[[Bihar Industrial Area Development Auhtority]]|| style="text-align:center;" | 144||style="text-align:right;" |285 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 11||[[Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority]]||style="text-align:center;" |73 ||style="text-align:right;" |150 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 12||[[Odisha Revenue Department]]||style="text-align:center;"|5,40,725 ||style="text-align:right;"|217.95 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 13||[[Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation]]||style="text-align:center;"|1,508||style="text-align:right;"|3,038 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 14||[[Maharashtra Dairy Development Department]]||style="text-align:center;"|3,198||style="text-align:right;"|8,11,000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 15||[[Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation]]||style="text-align:center;"|7,540||style="text-align:right;"|4,485 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 16 ||[[Special Economic Zones]]||style="text-align:center;"|72,847||style="text-align:right;" | 1,47,401 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 17 ||[[Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority]]||style="text-align:center;"|75 ||style="text-align:right;" | 1,320 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 18 ||[[Gujarat State Warehousing Corporation]]||style="text-align:center;"|33 ||style="text-align:right;"| 67 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 19 || [[Delhi Gram Sabha]]||style="text-align:center;"|622||style="text-align:right;"| 1,18,453 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 20 ||[[Haryana Irrigation Department]]||style="text-align:center;"|2,421||style="text-align:right;"| 4,899 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | scope = "row" colspan = "2" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Total''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''' 644,715 acre''' | ||
+ | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''₹ 19.76 lakh crore''' | ||
+ | |} | ||
==Minerals== | ==Minerals== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | The total value of the mineral resources of the country is estimated to be ₹5000 lakh crore. However, this number is highly conservative. The central or state governments do not have a dedicated database which lists all the resources under their control with the appropriate market values. The number also excludes the unexplored resources and spectrum under control of our governments. The number was calculated by using data available in the public domain by the Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability, a public-policy think tank based in New Delhi. <ref>Supra Note 4. </ref> The calculation only includes – | |
− | The | + | * Stocks of hydrocarbons in the country such as coal, lignite, crude oil, natural gas, etc. |
− | + | * Major mined and mineral resources stock in the country. <ref>Ibid. page 2.</ref> | |
− | + | According to an estimate by Schlumberger in 2015, India holds a minimum of 300 trillion cubic feet (Tfc) of gas and oil resources. An estimate of US Geological Survey reveals that India might be the world's second-largest holder of gas hydrate reserves. The total amount of reserves that India has can be between 300 and 2,100 (Tfc) as per the estimate by Schlumberger in 2015. | |
− | * | + | <br> |
− | + | According to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, the total 4.67 billion cubic meter (BCM) of natural gas was produced by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), Oil India Company (OIC) and Private Joint Ventures in the year 2017-18. These companies have been producing natural gas from fields/blocks located in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Tripura. The total balance recoverable reserve of natural gas is about 198 BCM in North-Eastern states. <ref>"Gas Reserves in Assam and Other North-Eastern States." Press Information Bureau Government of India Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. August 1, 2018. http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=181318..</ref> | |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | {|class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 80% | |
− | + | |+ style="color:#2B3990;"|<ref>Kundu Sridhar,[http://www.cbgaindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Estimated-Value-of-Government-Owned-Natural-Resources-in-India.pdf "A Note on | |
− | + | the Estimated Value of Government-Owned Natural Resources in India | |
− | + | "], CBGA, 2014, Table III</ref> | |
− | == | + | '''Mineral Wealth of India''' |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 15px;" | # | |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 150px;" | Mineral | |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Total Reserve (tonne) | |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Value (₹ crore) | |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Price (₹ thousand/ tonne) | |
− | + | ! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Method of Pricing (₹ crore) | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |1|| Antimony||1 lakh|| 490|| 518|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |2|| Asbestos||22.2 million|| 350|| 62,875|| Import Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |3|| Barytes|| 73 million || 5.2|| 38066|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |4 ||Betonite|| 568 million|| 26.6|| 15,10,969|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |5|| Borax ||74.2 thousand|| 20.2 ||150|| Import Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |6|| Calcite|| 20.94 million|| 4.7 || 9782 || Import Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |7|| Chromite|| 203 million ||16.5|| 3,35,934|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |8 || Copper || 1.56 billion || 45.3 || 70,69,237 || Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |9 ||Diamond|| 31.92 million ||0.207/carat|| 661|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |10|| Diaspore ||5.98 million|| 1|| 598|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |11 ||Diatomite ||2.9 million|| 8.9|| 2,554|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |12|| Dolomite ||7.7 billion|| 2.3 ||17,55,856|| Import parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |13|| Felspar|| 132 million ||3.4|| 44,595|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |14|| Fireclay || 713.5 million || 2.5|| 1,80,923|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |15|| Fluorite ||18.2 million|| 9.8 ||17,878|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |16|| Fuller Earth|| 256.7 million ||3.4|| 87,786|| Average Cost | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |17|| Garnet|| 56.96 million ||7.5|| 42,762|| Export Parity | |
− | + | |- | |
+ | |18|| Granite ||116 billion|| 12.3 ||14,29,39,709|| Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |19 ||Gold|| 493.69 million ||1920/kg|| 9,48,59,391|| Average Cost | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |20|| Graphite || 174.85 million ||32|| 560591|| Import Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |21|| Gypsum|| 1.2 billion || 1.3 || 1,71,950 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |22 || Titanium || 394 million || 5.1 || 2,01,376 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |23 || Iron Ore (Hematite) || 17.9 billion || 4.6 || 81,76,992 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |24 ||Iron (Magnetite) || 10.6 billion || 4.6 || 48,42,241 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |25 || Kyanite || 103.24 million || 13.6 || 1,40,480 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |26 || Sillimanite || 66.98 million || 11.4 || 76,201 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |27 || Andalusite || 18.5 million || 2.4 || 4,440 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |28 || Lead & Zinc || 685.6 million || 22.6 || 15,50,625 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |29 || Limestone || 184.9 bilion || 0.136 || 25,08,236 || Average Cost | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |30 || Magnesite || 335 million ||8.7 ||2,92,824 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |31 || Manganese || 288 million || 0.709 || 20,431 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |32 || Marble || 1.93 billion || 1.2 || 2,25,475 || Average Cost | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |33|| Mica || 5.3 lakh || 17.7|| 942.6 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |34 || Molybdenum || 19.3 million || 11.7 || 22,627.2 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |35 || Nickel || 189 million || 1,000 || 1,88,41,797 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |36 || Ochre || 144.26 million || 12 || 1,74,869 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |37 || Platinum || 15.7 || 70 /kg || 109 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |38 || Potash || 21.8 billion || 20 || 4,34,08,755 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |39 || Quartz and Silica || 3.5 billion || 5.6 || 19,72,584 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |40 || Quartizite || 1.25 billion || 30 || 37,35,119 || Import Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |41 || Silver || 467 million || 37/kg || 17,12,471 || Average Cost | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |42 || Talc/Steatite/Soapstone || 270 million || 6 || 1,61,744 || Export Parity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |43 || Tin || 83.73 million || 0.152/kg || 12,72,696 || Average Cost | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | scope = "row" colspan = "3" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Total''' | ||
+ | | scope = "row" colspan = "3" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''₹ 33,90,35,819.8 crore''' | ||
+ | |} | ||
=Methodology= | =Methodology= | ||
==Land values and Floor Space Index== | ==Land values and Floor Space Index== | ||
− | The Floor Space Index (FSI) is the ratio between the area of a covered floor space (built-up area) to the area of that plot on which a building stands. An index of 1 implies that the total covered floor space is 1000 Sq. | + | Wherever possible the value of land has been taken from the reports of CAG. In some cases, the body that has made details of its surplus land has also made its valuation available. In such cases, this valuation is used. |
− | + | Internal valuation of land has been estimated for land data where its valuation has not been given. These estimations are based on conservative land prices in the market obtained from property valuation portals for rural, semi-urban, and urban land in the country. | |
+ | The FSI in each case is assumed to be merely 1. | ||
+ | ===FSI=== | ||
+ | The Floor Space Index (FSI) is the ratio between the area of a covered floor space (built-up area) to the area of that plot on which a building stands. An index of 1 implies that the total covered floor space is 1000 Sq.metre. on a plot of 1000 Sq.metre. The Floor Space Index in New Delhi ranges from 1.2 to 3.5 meaning that 1200 to 3500 Sq. metre. of floor space is available for every 1000 Sq. metre. plot there. | ||
==Minerals== | ==Minerals== | ||
Line 113: | Line 303: | ||
==Land== | ==Land== | ||
− | The data on the unused public lands was collected by researchers at Free A Billion from authoritative governmental and non-governmental sources. These sources include Parliamentary Questions, | + | The data on the unused public lands was collected by researchers at Free A Billion from authoritative governmental and non-governmental sources. These sources include Parliamentary Questions, data collected by various NGOs and think-tanks, government databases, information available from various Ministries and Departments of the Government of India. |
+ | |||
+ | =References= |
Latest revision as of 07:52, 21 October 2019
India has enormous public wealth. This is the wealth that is owned by the people and controlled by the government.[1].
The goal of Dhan Vapasi wiki is to pull together information of public wealth of India from credible and publicly available sources.
Such information is fragmented and mostly unavailable at present. Dhan Vapasi wiki aims to fill this deficit.
The public wealth of India belongs to its citizens and so does the information about its details.
The value that can be derived out of India's natural resources has been estimated at ₹ 1,000 crores [2]
The value of surplus public land available in the country is ₹ 340 crores. This wealth is more than ₹50 lakh for each household in India.
Resource | Value (₹ lakh crore) | Value per household (₹) | |
---|---|---|---|
Surplus Public Land | 340 | 13,60,000 | |
Natural Resources | 1,252 | 50,11,000 | |
Hydrocarbon | 378 | 15,12,000 | |
Mines & Minerals | 847 | 33,90,000 | |
Radioactive Substances | 27 | 1,09,000 | |
Value of Dhan Vapsi Fund as on February 2018 | ₹ 1,592 lakh crore | ₹ 63,71,000 | |
Duration Dhan Vapsi Fund can last | 63 Years |
Contents
Background
Historically, the ownership of public wealth belonged to the kings in India and most other parts of the world by the invocation of the divine rights or through means of coercion. Presently, the rights over the public wealth belong to the democratically elected Indian government, which is obligated under the constitution to use this wealth for public good.[3]
Ancient India
In ancient India, even though the Kings represented the State, the mineral wealth did not vest in them. They were only entitled to receive the taxes or revenue form the production or extraction of minerals.[4] Simultaneously, the ownership of other public resources such as forests and water bodies were shared by the community which relied on them. However, the ownership of mineral resources gradually transferred to the state beginning with the empire of Chandragupta Maurya, particularly as Kautilya[5] justified state monopoly over mineral resources in his seminal work Arthasastra.[6] The ownership of resources other than minerals, such as forests and water bodies, continued to be with the kings or the community in one form or the other across India till the arrival of the British East India Company.
British India
The British East India Company started using the power of the state to acquire private property[7] for public use as early as 1824 in Bengal and other parts of India. The Bengal Regulation I of 1824 allowed the Company to obtain private properties by paying a fair price for construction of “roads, canals, or other public purposes”[8] when the Company only had limited rights related to taxation and trade as per the powers bestowed on it by the British Crown. Thus, all acquisitions conducted under the Bengal regulation and similar laws in other parts of India were patently illegal until 1857 when the British Crown took over control of India. Following that, the British acquired most of the natural and mineral resources of India; either by acquisition with meagre compensation or by coercion. Concurrently with the British rule, different princely states in India adopted similar policies with respect to the ownership of public wealth. While some states adopted the state’s ownership of public wealth, others bestowed the ownership to the community. Some states neglected the issue altogether and adopted a non-property attitude towards public wealth and kept it as commons[9], particularly in case of forests and water bodies.
Modern India
The Constitution of India bestows the ownership and control over using resources is in hands of the central and state governments under various articles. However, individuals and corporations can make use of the public resources under a license from the government. Since independence, there has been no concrete effort by the central or the state governments to define public wealth or regulate the same in a meaningful manner, instead the governments have chosen to deal with the issue on an ad-hoc basis. Noting the same, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, while announcing the judgment on 2G scam in 2012, observed – “no comprehensive legislation has been enacted to generally define natural resources and a framework for their protection.”[10] Given the constitutional provisions, the Indian state is the trustee and legal owner of the public wealth of India under the doctrine of public trust, which "enjoins upon the Government to protect the resources for the enjoyment of the public rather than to permit their use for private ownership or commercial purposes".[11] Natural resources belong to the people, but the State legally owns them on our behalf.
Public Wealth of India
Public wealth is the sum of the public assets collectively owned by all citizens of the country. The government is the manager of this public wealth. It comprises of public commercial assets under the government, such as various natural resources, public sector undertakings (PSUs) and commercial real estate. The term public consists of wealth owned by all the levels of government namely, central, state, and local levels. Public assets do not comprise public property, which refers to assets and resources that are available to the entire public for use, such as roads and bridges, public parks, protected wildlife sanctuaries. Public wealth consists of assets or operations generating an income that could be given some kind of market value if properly structured and used. Typical examples include:
- minerals
- real estate such as Lutyens Bungalow Zone (New Delhi), Navy Nagar (Mumbai)
- central and state public sector enterprises
- financial institutions
- land banks available with various state land development authorities and in special economic zones (SEZs)
- land and buildings under the government for provision of non-essential functions [12].
The total public wealth recorded from publicly available information is ₹ 1,341 lakh crore (₹ 53,64,000 per household [13]) as on October 2018.
Land
Land among capital, labour and entrepreneurial skills is one of the four fundamental resources that determines the size and productivity of an economy.
Land in India is suffering from an artificial scarcity created out of a high cost of acquisition from excessive regulations. Major urban land parcels are lying vacant and unused locking valuable land available in the market.
The following calculation points out there is ample land available in the country –
If one places 1.2 billion people in four-person homes of 1000 square feet each, and two workers of the family into office/factory space of 400 square feet, this requires roughly 1 per cent of India's land area assuming an FSI of 1. [14]
Yet the price of land in a city like Mumbai or Delhi is much more compared to major cities across the world.
The government-owned land is part of the problem. An estimate holds that governments own as much as __ per cent of total available land in the country [IDF report pick the number/ idea]. This keeps away productive land from falling into private hands for generating revenue and employment.
The defence forces are the largest landowners in the country. Excluding the prime urban land occupied in cities by defence stations, the surplus land as per internal and CG audits is 78,846 acres.
Railways are the second largest landowners in the country with 6,407 acres land available.[15]
Major ports in the country also hold huge tracts of land. The land available with all the major ports is 27,379 acres.
National Textile Corporation holds 1,158 acres of prime urban land locked by defunct mills within densely populated cities.
Various public sector enterprises, now defunct, or serial loss-making enterprises have locked away highly valuable urban land parcels.
Special Economic Zones are a special case of how land was forecefully extracted and acquired from the poor in the name of industralisation, only to remain wasted and unusued. The land available with them is an estimated 72,847 acres.
The table below highlights many such insitutions and bodies locking away land in cities. This list is bound to expand as more information is uncovered.
Table 2 and Table 3 point out the surplus land available with various government bodies owned by central and state governments.
# | Body Name | Area (acre) | Value (₹ crore) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Air India | NA[16] | 8,000 |
2 | Railways | 6,407 | 2,70,406 |
3 | Defence | 296,914 | 24,53,664 |
4 | Department of Posts | 1,146 | 366 |
5 | Delhi Development Authority | 5,675 | 1,00,000 |
6 | Heavy Engineering Corporation | 5,000 | 14,560 |
8 | Hindustan Machines and Tools Ltd. | 471 | 997 |
9 | Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) | 2,982 | 6,140 |
10 | Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd | 938 | 20,224 |
11 | National Textile Corporation | 1,158 | 25,622 |
12 | Port Trusts | 27,379 | 20,02,717 |
13 | Richardson & Cruddas | 76 | 9,824 |
14 | Steel Authority of India Limited | 29,008 | 58,149 |
15 | Lutyens Bungalow Zone | 6,177 | 19,32,683 |
Total | 383,331 acre | ₹ 68.62 lakh crore |
Minerals
The total value of the mineral resources of the country is estimated to be ₹5000 lakh crore. However, this number is highly conservative. The central or state governments do not have a dedicated database which lists all the resources under their control with the appropriate market values. The number also excludes the unexplored resources and spectrum under control of our governments. The number was calculated by using data available in the public domain by the Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability, a public-policy think tank based in New Delhi. [17] The calculation only includes –
- Stocks of hydrocarbons in the country such as coal, lignite, crude oil, natural gas, etc.
- Major mined and mineral resources stock in the country. [18]
According to an estimate by Schlumberger in 2015, India holds a minimum of 300 trillion cubic feet (Tfc) of gas and oil resources. An estimate of US Geological Survey reveals that India might be the world's second-largest holder of gas hydrate reserves. The total amount of reserves that India has can be between 300 and 2,100 (Tfc) as per the estimate by Schlumberger in 2015.
According to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, the total 4.67 billion cubic meter (BCM) of natural gas was produced by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), Oil India Company (OIC) and Private Joint Ventures in the year 2017-18. These companies have been producing natural gas from fields/blocks located in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Tripura. The total balance recoverable reserve of natural gas is about 198 BCM in North-Eastern states. [19]
# | Mineral | Total Reserve (tonne) | Value (₹ crore) | Price (₹ thousand/ tonne) | Method of Pricing (₹ crore) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Antimony | 1 lakh | 490 | 518 | Export Parity |
2 | Asbestos | 22.2 million | 350 | 62,875 | Import Parity |
3 | Barytes | 73 million | 5.2 | 38066 | Export Parity |
4 | Betonite | 568 million | 26.6 | 15,10,969 | Export Parity |
5 | Borax | 74.2 thousand | 20.2 | 150 | Import Parity |
6 | Calcite | 20.94 million | 4.7 | 9782 | Import Parity |
7 | Chromite | 203 million | 16.5 | 3,35,934 | Export Parity |
8 | Copper | 1.56 billion | 45.3 | 70,69,237 | Export Parity |
9 | Diamond | 31.92 million | 0.207/carat | 661 | Export Parity |
10 | Diaspore | 5.98 million | 1 | 598 | Export Parity |
11 | Diatomite | 2.9 million | 8.9 | 2,554 | Export Parity |
12 | Dolomite | 7.7 billion | 2.3 | 17,55,856 | Import parity |
13 | Felspar | 132 million | 3.4 | 44,595 | Export Parity |
14 | Fireclay | 713.5 million | 2.5 | 1,80,923 | Export Parity |
15 | Fluorite | 18.2 million | 9.8 | 17,878 | Export Parity |
16 | Fuller Earth | 256.7 million | 3.4 | 87,786 | Average Cost |
17 | Garnet | 56.96 million | 7.5 | 42,762 | Export Parity |
18 | Granite | 116 billion | 12.3 | 14,29,39,709 | Export Parity |
19 | Gold | 493.69 million | 1920/kg | 9,48,59,391 | Average Cost |
20 | Graphite | 174.85 million | 32 | 560591 | Import Parity |
21 | Gypsum | 1.2 billion | 1.3 | 1,71,950 | Export Parity |
22 | Titanium | 394 million | 5.1 | 2,01,376 | Export Parity |
23 | Iron Ore (Hematite) | 17.9 billion | 4.6 | 81,76,992 | Export Parity |
24 | Iron (Magnetite) | 10.6 billion | 4.6 | 48,42,241 | Export Parity |
25 | Kyanite | 103.24 million | 13.6 | 1,40,480 | Export Parity |
26 | Sillimanite | 66.98 million | 11.4 | 76,201 | Export Parity |
27 | Andalusite | 18.5 million | 2.4 | 4,440 | Export Parity |
28 | Lead & Zinc | 685.6 million | 22.6 | 15,50,625 | Export Parity |
29 | Limestone | 184.9 bilion | 0.136 | 25,08,236 | Average Cost |
30 | Magnesite | 335 million | 8.7 | 2,92,824 | Export Parity |
31 | Manganese | 288 million | 0.709 | 20,431 | Export Parity |
32 | Marble | 1.93 billion | 1.2 | 2,25,475 | Average Cost |
33 | Mica | 5.3 lakh | 17.7 | 942.6 | Export Parity |
34 | Molybdenum | 19.3 million | 11.7 | 22,627.2 | Export Parity |
35 | Nickel | 189 million | 1,000 | 1,88,41,797 | Export Parity |
36 | Ochre | 144.26 million | 12 | 1,74,869 | Export Parity |
37 | Platinum | 15.7 | 70 /kg | 109 | Export Parity |
38 | Potash | 21.8 billion | 20 | 4,34,08,755 | Export Parity |
39 | Quartz and Silica | 3.5 billion | 5.6 | 19,72,584 | Export Parity |
40 | Quartizite | 1.25 billion | 30 | 37,35,119 | Import Parity |
41 | Silver | 467 million | 37/kg | 17,12,471 | Average Cost |
42 | Talc/Steatite/Soapstone | 270 million | 6 | 1,61,744 | Export Parity |
43 | Tin | 83.73 million | 0.152/kg | 12,72,696 | Average Cost |
Total | ₹ 33,90,35,819.8 crore |
Methodology
Land values and Floor Space Index
Wherever possible the value of land has been taken from the reports of CAG. In some cases, the body that has made details of its surplus land has also made its valuation available. In such cases, this valuation is used. Internal valuation of land has been estimated for land data where its valuation has not been given. These estimations are based on conservative land prices in the market obtained from property valuation portals for rural, semi-urban, and urban land in the country. The FSI in each case is assumed to be merely 1.
FSI
The Floor Space Index (FSI) is the ratio between the area of a covered floor space (built-up area) to the area of that plot on which a building stands. An index of 1 implies that the total covered floor space is 1000 Sq.metre. on a plot of 1000 Sq.metre. The Floor Space Index in New Delhi ranges from 1.2 to 3.5 meaning that 1200 to 3500 Sq. metre. of floor space is available for every 1000 Sq. metre. plot there.
Minerals
The estimated values of the mineral resources are based on a detailed study done by the Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability, a think-tank based in New Delhi, in 2014. The author of the report has mentioned that he calculated the value of minerals based on the information from the public domain from various governmental and non-governmental agencies.
Land
The data on the unused public lands was collected by researchers at Free A Billion from authoritative governmental and non-governmental sources. These sources include Parliamentary Questions, data collected by various NGOs and think-tanks, government databases, information available from various Ministries and Departments of the Government of India.
References
- ↑ Article 297, Constitution of India, 1950
- ↑ This value is the realisable value estimated as 25% of the total value of natural resources.
- ↑ Article 39 (b) states – “The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing ... (b) that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good.”
- ↑ Indian Bureau of Mines. (2011). Mineral Royalties. Nagpur: Indian Bureau of Mines.
- ↑ Ancient Indian teacher, philosopher, economist, jurist, and royal advisor, 371-283 BC.
- ↑ Supra, Note 5.
- ↑ The power of “Eminent Domain” – Forceful acquisition or requisition of property by the government for public purpose.
- ↑ Bhattacharyya, D. (2015). History of Eminent Domain in Colonial Thought and Legal Practice. Economic & Political Weekly, L (50), 46.
- ↑ Cultural or natural resource accessible to all members of the society.
- ↑ Centre for Public Interest Litigation and others v. Union of India and others, (2012) 3 SCC 1
- ↑ M. C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997)1 SCC 388
- ↑ Non-essential functions are those that are not directly connected with the maintenance of law and order, and national security.
- ↑ No. of households – 25 crore (125 crore population [Census 2011] / 5 [size of a household as per GoI])
- ↑ Shah A, Economic Times "Why real estate is a bad long-term investment"
- ↑ as disclose by railways, however, there exists a larger unfound inventory requiring a thorough audit
- ↑ Information on the total land held by Air India is not known, however its approximate value is made available in the financial reports
- ↑ Supra Note 4.
- ↑ Ibid. page 2.
- ↑ "Gas Reserves in Assam and Other North-Eastern States." Press Information Bureau Government of India Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. August 1, 2018. http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=181318..
- ↑ Kundu Sridhar,[http://www.cbgaindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Estimated-Value-of-Government-Owned-Natural-Resources-in-India.pdf "A Note on the Estimated Value of Government-Owned Natural Resources in India "], CBGA, 2014, Table III